Online Addictions: Conceptualizations, Debates, and Controversies
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Transgenerational Epigenetics: Current Controversies and Debates
Chapter Outline Introduction 371 Epigenetics and Behavioral Biology 374 Epigenotypes Versus Epiphenotypes (Molecular vs. Molar Epigenetics) 375 The Epigenotype or Molecular Epigenetics 375 The Epiphenotype or Molar Epigenetics 376 Context-Dependent vs. Germline-Dependent Epigenetic Modifications 376 Context-Dependent Epigenetic Modification 377 Germline-Dependent Epigenetic Modification 378 Tra...
متن کاملChapter 26 – Transgenerational Epigenetics: Current Controversies and Debates
Chapter Outline Introduction 371 Epigenetics and Behavioral Biology 374 Epigenotypes Versus Epiphenotypes (Molecular vs. Molar Epigenetics) 375 The Epigenotype or Molecular Epigenetics 375 The Epiphenotype or Molar Epigenetics 376 Context-Dependent vs. Germline-Dependent Epigenetic Modifications 376 Context-Dependent Epigenetic Modification 377 Germline-Dependent Epigenetic Modification 378 Tra...
متن کاملAutomatic Summarization of Online Debates
Debate summarization is one of the novel and challenging research areas in automatic text summarization which has been largely unexplored. In this paper, we develop a debate summarization pipeline to summarize key topics which are discussed or argued in the two opposing sides of online debates. We view that the generation of debate summaries can be achieved by clustering, cluster labeling, and ...
متن کاملRecognizing Stances in Online Debates
This paper presents an unsupervised opinion analysis method for debate-side classification, i.e., recognizing which stance a person is taking in an online debate. In order to handle the complexities of this genre, we mine the web to learn associations that are indicative of opinion stances in debates. We combine this knowledge with discourse information, and formulate the debate side classifica...
متن کاملUnshared task: (Dis)agreement in online debates
Topic-independent expressions for conveying agreement and disagreement were annotated in a corpus of web forum debates, in order to evaluate a classifier trained to detect these two categories. Among the 175 expressions annotated in the evaluation set, 163 were unique, which shows that there is large variation in expressions used. This variation might be one of the reasons why the task of autom...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions
سال: 2016
ISSN: 2148-7286
DOI: 10.15805/addicta.2016.3.0101